Home Browse MREA Events Contact Us Careers Industry Info MREA News
Industry Info

Industry Info - Recent Headlines

 

 

 

And the wind waits ... and waits ...

The waiting list for proposed wind energy projects in the state is 612 years. But changes are afoot. To anyone who wants to join the wind energy movement, Ryan Wolf says: Get in line. Wolf, of Le Sueur, Minn., has been waiting almost two years for the go-ahead to build 27 wind turbines in the southwest part of the state. It's anyone's guess how much longer he'll be waiting, given a backlog of applications that technically could take more than 600 years to clear at the federal agency that stands between him and the renewable energy marketplace.

"The queue is the biggest problem we're struggling with," agreed Clair Moeller, a vice president at that gatekeeper agency in St. Paul, the Midwest Independent Transmission System (Midwest ISO). While the national mood has shifted to embrace renewable energy, and states including Minnesota have pledged increased usage, conditions on the ground are not making it easy. Developers point to shortages of the wind turbines, engineers to run them and transmission lines to carry the electricity they produce.

But many say the biggest immediate problem is the bottleneck at the regional agencies of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -- Midwest ISO, in 15 Upper Midwest states -- that give projects permission to connect to existing power lines. And the Midwest is in the worst shape, they say, because its windy plains are prompting more project proposals than anywhere else. Moeller's staff has adapted new procedures -- one is clustering several proposals into a single study -- so they expect to be able to clear the queue in 50 years instead of 600. And this spring he will ask federal regulators to approve more adaptations to further speed the process.

But every passing year drives up the cost of the projects -- which is passed on to consumers. And the backlog stands in the way of Minnesota's pledge to get 25 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2025.

The agency also vets all the requests by new power projects to connect to the already congested transmission system. Each request takes about two years to process, because Midwest ISO's obligations include locating any point along the grid that's already maxed out -- even hundreds of miles away. Then it has to put a dollar figure on the work needed at those points -- something similar to adding two lanes to an overloaded four-lane highway -- and then give that bill to the developer. Source: Star Tribune


Cut up to 10 Percent of Your Electric Bill Simply by Turning Off "Vampire" Appliances

There are insomniacs in our homes that work late at night and run up the electricity bill. They are not the classically overworked American who pops melatonin or Tylenol PM. They are microwave ovens, computers and TVs. They are half of our appliances, electronic equipment and associated chargers that suck down power even when they're turned off, in sleep or standby mode. A typical house hosts around 50 such insomniacs, and though individual devices use minuscule amounts of electricity, in the aggregate they're an astonishing and pricey burden.

This "vampire energy loss" represents between 5 and 8 percent of a single family home's total electricity use per year, according to the Department of Energy. On average, that's the equivalent of one month's electricity bill. Source: Salon.com[Read more]


Industrial Rates Up in Deregulated States

The gap in industrial retail electricity prices between the deregulated and regulated states has roughly tripled since 1999, from a difference of 1.09 cents per kwh in 1999 to 3.08 cents per kwh in 2007, according to a study by the group Power in the Public Interest (PPI). The study, based on data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, said industrial customers in deregulated states pay roughly $7.2 billion more annually for their power than their counterparts in regulated states pay for the same amount of electricity.

Deregulation is not responsible for the entire gap, but the so-called competitive electricity markets are not good for competitiveness, a PPI spokesperson said.

Other key findings include:

  • Since 1999, prices for industrial customers in deregulated states have gone from 18 percent above to 37 percent above the national average, while prices for industrial customers in regulated states have gone from 7 percent below to 12 percent below the national average.
  • Comparing the two groups directly to each other, since 1999, deregulated industrial prices have gone from 26 percent higher to 56 percent higher than regulated prices.
  • The gap in retail prices for all customers —residential, commercial and industrial—between deregulated and regulated states has more than doubled, from 2.1 cents per kwh in 1999 to 4.3 cents per kwh in 2007.

The major cause of the increasing gap, according to PPI, is the wholesale market designs used by regional transmission organizations, where the most expensive supply, often a natural gas plant, sets the price for all needed supplies, regardless of the underlying cost.

The study is available on PPI's Web site. Source: CFC Solutions News Extra


NRECA Poll Shows Customer Concern About Environmental Costs

In Chicago, NRECA CEO Glenn English called the critical need to add capacity, coupled with the uncertainty, but likely very expensive imposition of carbon constraint, as a “train-wreck.”  Glenn said the poll commissioned by NRECA shows a perception of a “firestorm.” We need, he said, to communicate to co-op members that we are fighting on their behalf to identify “costs” associated with carbon constraint-related legislation.  The 80 some participants then heard the results of an extensive poll (1,000 sampling) and focus groups which collectively expressed these views:

  • 19% felt energy/environment was the nation’s top concern compared with 45% who named the Iraq war. However, 32% of the respondents said climate change is the most important environmental concern.
  • When asked if the “solution” to climate change would extend beyond 10 years, 60% said that sounded about right.
  • Oddly, respondents thought coal and oil produced about the same amount of current.  Coal accounts for 50% (for co-ops that jumps to 80%) and oil is 3%.
  • 72% polled said legislation to reduce emissions should not be passed without knowing the costs.
  • 43% of respondents oppose any more coal-fired generation.
  • High gas prices netted 59% of consumers worries compared to 18% which fussed about high electric bills. Overall 58% think the current price of electricity is ok.
  • Finally, 66% said any hit to the light bill to deal with carbon better be under 10%.
Talking only about the cost of carbon constraint will create the same congressional cacophony as an “American Idol” contestant doing domestic violence to a cover of Free Bird by Lynyrd Skynyrd.  Campaign consultant Tom King counseled that co-ops must stress, repeatedly, our conservation and green efforts.  You will be ignored he said if you disregard the co-op’s CO2 reduction contributions with an opening that rates will double.  King said co-ops cannot walk away from global climate change.  However, the concerns about costs, witnessed by polling data, must be factored into any discussion. Source: MREA Report

Basin Electric General Manager Says New Generation a Challenge

The general manager of Basin Electric Power Cooperative says Basin's power generation plans will require about 6 billion-dollars in capital over the next decade. Ron Harper spoke at the Basin's annual meeting in Bismarck. Harper says the co-op has started construction on a power plant in Gillette, Wyoming, and is considering two others. He says getting the money to meet power generation needs will be "no small task," but Basin is up to the challenge.

Harper says the U.S. still gets 50 percent of its energy from coal, and he says coal will remain part of the energy future. But he says Basin also is addressing environmental challenges with such projects as a carbon sequestration and energy conservation. Source: KXMC-TV (Minot, ND)


Providing service and leadership for electric cooperatives.

©2004 MREA. All rights reserved. 11640 73rd Avenue North Maple Grove, MN 55369
TEL 763.424.1020 FAX 763.424.5820 EMAIL info@mrea.org
MREA Privacy Policy